However, a description of gearing level in 1958 by Modigliani & Millar (Arnold, 2008, p.793) argues that there is no impact on the WACC to shareholder wealth and no optimal structure exists. But his theory is assuming that there is no taxation and no costs of financial distress and liquidation. Even the theory is correct, can it apply to this real world business? In my opinion, it can’t.
The share price of Bank of Ireland increased 41% to prevent the government take the majority stake of the bank. However, a test which was found by Irish banking system stated that those banks need £21.2bn to survive the financial crisis. Bank of Ireland tries their best to meet the capital requirements from Irish banking system. (BBC, 2011)
They may do it by debt management which increases the debt to reduce government Intervention. However, as mentioned above, these would cause financial crisis.
Some analysts suggest another method that Bank of Ireland might solve this problem by restructuring. It is because the cost of restructure is paid by taxpayer. (BBC, 2011) However, if relate to the theory of Modigliani & Millar, assuming there is no taxation. Who are going to pay for these? Ultimately, Bank of Ireland has to pay for it.
If Bank of Ireland raises funds by other countries banks, it may cause credit crunch. Thus, it means that Bank of Ireland is difficult to raise funds by those methods to finance business.
In this situation, Bank of Ireland has to make decision how to raise money that least harm to the firms. As mentioned above, Modigliani & Millar theory can’t apply to the real world, I think the most suitable method is to restructure the business to prevent government take the majority stake of Bank of Ireland that reduce the shareholder’s wealth.
Reference:
No comments:
Post a Comment